SARS 2026/2027LIVERepo Rate7.00%+0,25% since 28 May 2026Prime Rate10.50%+0,25% since 28 May 2026VAT Rate15%UIF CeilingR17,712Tax ThresholdR99,000USD/ZAR16.41Exchange rate updated 29 Sept 2026Municipal audits5 of 26clean · tracked hereLatest case27 Jul 2026GautengWater systems2824 cited-period concernsSARS 2026/2027LIVERepo Rate7.00%+0,25% since 28 May 2026Prime Rate10.50%+0,25% since 28 May 2026VAT Rate15%UIF CeilingR17,712Tax ThresholdR99,000USD/ZAR16.41Exchange rate updated 29 Sept 2026Municipal audits5 of 26clean · tracked hereLatest case27 Jul 2026GautengWater systems2824 cited-period concerns
OOdyssey Tools
Evidence42 tracked rows · source reconciliation pending · Corruption and asset-recovery casesFamily-level scope · details ↓
42 tracked rows · source reconciliation pendingCorruption and asset-recovery cases

Odyssey currently tracks 42 public-record rows. The latest C2 sweep added three newer direct-primary SIU matters, while some legacy rows still cite documented secondary reporting or generic agency landing pages. Row-level primary-source and status reconciliation remains incomplete.

Period / scope
Event-driven case records
Whole-dataset check
Checked 11 Aug 2026

Evidence status is dataset-family level. Row-level and field-level source labels still control where they are more specific.

Home›Corruption Tracker›Siyenza Toilet Tender Asset Restraint — R60M
Eastern Cape · PUBLIC-RECORD DOSSIER

Siyenza Toilet Tender Asset Restraint — R60M

R60 millionCharges preferredPreserved / restrainedOfficial primary citation

Siyenza Toilet Tender Asset Restraint — R60M is tracked with a matter-specific row value of R60 million in Eastern Cape. The matter is recorded at the stage of charges preferred with an asset status of preserved / restrained. Odyssey does not infer that the row value equals the amount frozen, forfeited, recovered or lost unless the cited record says so. The cited matter relates to the Amathole District Municipality. The cited source names or links 5 people or entities to the matter, including Bongani Mpeluza, Chris Magwangqana, Nkosinathi Soga and 2 others; inclusion here does not independently establish guilt or a final adverse finding.

Record semantics

Tracked row valueR60 million
Amount meaningPreservation value
Amount precisionApproximate amount
Value basisAFU-stated estimated value of assets frozen under a Grahamstown High Court restraint order; distinguished from the R16 million proved to have been spent on erecting toilets.
Case stageCharges preferred
Asset statusPreserved / restrained
Recorded legacy statusAssets Frozen
Recorded date17 June 2022

Matter & assets

The Grahamstown High Court froze assets worth an estimated R60 million after corruption, fraud and money-laundering charges were brought over the Amathole District Municipality Siyenza accelerated sanitation programme tender. Bongani Mpeluza's Gauteng house remained preserved as proceeds of the scheme.

Asset / subject descriptionPreserved Gauteng house of Bongani Mpeluza; broader restrained asset pool estimated at R60 million
Department / entityAmathole District Municipality
Court orderGrahamstown High Court restraint order; property preserved from 31 July 2020
MappingMapped · Legacy approximate anchor
Location descriptionAmathole District Municipality — preserved Gauteng property, Eastern Cape

Named / linked in cited source (5)

Naming/linkage in the cited record does not independently establish guilt or a final adverse finding.

Bongani MpeluzaChris MagwangqanaNkosinathi SogaMpumelelo SheziLulama Taleni

Evidence & provenance

Matter Authority

NPA

Citation publisher

National Prosecuting Authority

Citation type: Official primary citation
Verification: Official primary citation
Source checked: 2026-09-22
View cited source →
Scope & interpretation

Entries summarise cited public records, which can include preservation or forfeiture orders, charges, investigations, judgments and settlements. Statuses are source-bounded; inclusion does not by itself establish criminal guilt or a final finding against a named person or entity.

Tracked row value reflects the value referenced in the cited record. The headline is the arithmetic sum of each tracked row’s matter-specific value. Rows can refer to preserved or forfeited assets, alleged scheme or contract values, repayments, restrained funds or other source-defined amounts. It is not a national corruption total, a recovered-assets total, or a de-duplicated measure of public loss.

Some legacy rows still cite documented secondary sources or generic agency pages rather than a direct case-level primary source. Updated manually — may not reflect the latest case developments.

Share this dossier

Explore other tracked records

Milongani Eco Consulting Nelson Mandela Bay EIA TenderSame province (Eastern Cape)
R11 million
S v Chetty — Eastern Cape Social Development R26M RestraintSame province (Eastern Cape)
R26 million
View the full Corruption Asset Tracker →

Entries summarise cited public records, which can include preservation or forfeiture orders, charges, investigations, judgments and settlements. Statuses are source-bounded; inclusion does not by itself establish criminal guilt or a final finding against a named person or entity. Some legacy rows still cite documented secondary sources or generic agency pages rather than a direct case-level primary source. The headline is the arithmetic sum of each tracked row’s matter-specific value. Rows can refer to preserved or forfeited assets, alleged scheme or contract values, repayments, restrained funds or other source-defined amounts. It is not a national corruption total, a recovered-assets total, or a de-duplicated measure of public loss. Updated manually — may not reflect the latest case developments.