Eastern Cape · PUBLIC-RECORD DOSSIER
Milongani Eco Consulting Nelson Mandela Bay EIA Tender
R11 millionCharges preferredPreserved / restrainedOfficial primary citation
Milongani Eco Consulting Nelson Mandela Bay EIA Tender is tracked with a matter-specific row value of R11 million in Eastern Cape. The matter is recorded at the stage of charges preferred with an asset status of preserved / restrained. Odyssey does not infer that the row value equals the amount frozen, forfeited, recovered or lost unless the cited record says so. The cited matter relates to the Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality. The cited source names or links Milongani Eco Consulting and associates to the matter; inclusion here does not independently establish guilt or a final adverse finding.
Record semantics
Tracked row valueR11 million
Amount meaningPreservation value
Amount precisionSource-rounded figure
Value basisAFU-stated value of assets restrained under a 27 July 2021 court order; distinguished from the alleged R25.6 million contract loss and initial R1 million invoice.
Case stageCharges preferred
Asset statusPreserved / restrained
Recorded legacy statusAssets Frozen
Recorded date17 June 2022
Matter & assets
The AFU obtained a restraint order of R11 million in a Nelson Mandela Bay environmental impact assessment tender awarded to Milongani Eco Consulting. The state says the contract caused losses of R25.6 million and the service provider invoiced R1 million within 24 hours of appointment, with collusion alleged between municipal employees and the contractor.
Asset / subject descriptionRestrained assets to the value of R11 million
Department / entityNelson Mandela Bay Municipality
Court orderAFU restraint order, 27 July 2021
MappingNot currently mapped
Location descriptionGqeberha, Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality, Eastern Cape
Named / linked in cited source (1)
Naming/linkage in the cited record does not independently establish guilt or a final adverse finding.
Milongani Eco Consulting and associates
Evidence & provenance
Citation publisher
National Prosecuting Authority
Citation type: Official primary citation
Verification: Official primary citation
Source checked: 2026-09-22
View cited source →Scope & interpretation
Entries summarise cited public records, which can include preservation or forfeiture orders, charges, investigations, judgments and settlements. Statuses are source-bounded; inclusion does not by itself establish criminal guilt or a final finding against a named person or entity.
Tracked row value reflects the value referenced in the cited record. The headline is the arithmetic sum of each tracked row’s matter-specific value. Rows can refer to preserved or forfeited assets, alleged scheme or contract values, repayments, restrained funds or other source-defined amounts. It is not a national corruption total, a recovered-assets total, or a de-duplicated measure of public loss.
Some legacy rows still cite documented secondary sources or generic agency pages rather than a direct case-level primary source. Updated manually — may not reflect the latest case developments.
Share this dossierExplore other tracked records
View the full Corruption Asset Tracker →Entries summarise cited public records, which can include preservation or forfeiture orders, charges, investigations, judgments and settlements. Statuses are source-bounded; inclusion does not by itself establish criminal guilt or a final finding against a named person or entity. Some legacy rows still cite documented secondary sources or generic agency pages rather than a direct case-level primary source. The headline is the arithmetic sum of each tracked row’s matter-specific value. Rows can refer to preserved or forfeited assets, alleged scheme or contract values, repayments, restrained funds or other source-defined amounts. It is not a national corruption total, a recovered-assets total, or a de-duplicated measure of public loss. Updated manually — may not reflect the latest case developments.