SARS 2026/2027LIVERepo Rate7.50%Prime Rate11.50%USD/ZAR~18.40VAT Rate15%UIF CeilingR17,712Tax ThresholdR99,000SARS 2026/2027LIVERepo Rate7.50%Prime Rate11.50%USD/ZAR~18.40VAT Rate15%UIF CeilingR17,712Tax ThresholdR99,000
O
Odyssey Tools
HomeCorruption TrackerS v Chetty — Eastern Cape Social Development R26M Restraint
Eastern Cape · SA Corruption Asset Tracker

S v Chetty — Eastern Cape Social Development R26M Restraint

Assets FrozenR26 million⚠ Medium confidence

S v Chetty — Eastern Cape Social Development R26M Restraint involves R26 million in assets frozen by court order in Eastern Cape, according to official records. It represents a substantial sum of public money. The matter relates to the Eastern Cape Department of Social Development. One individual, Chetty and others, has been formally implicated through official proceedings. This case is recorded at medium confidence — verify the details against the original official NPA source before relying on them.

Case details

The AFU obtained a restraint of R26 million in S v Chetty & Others, a procurement fraud case involving the Eastern Cape Department of Social Development. The amount involved was just under R30 million with the restraint obtained in August 2020 and criminal proceedings still pending.

AssetsRestrained assets to the value of R26 million
Department / entityEastern Cape Department of Social Development
Estimated valueR26 million
StatusAssets Frozen
Court orderAFU restraint dated 27 August 2020 in S v Chetty & Others
Date reported17 June 2022
LocationBhisho / East London — Eastern Cape Social Development procurement, Eastern Cape

Implicated (1)

Chetty and others

Source — NPA

Reported 17 June 2022

View official source →
📱 Share this case

Related cases

Milongani Eco Consulting Nelson Mandela Bay EIA TenderR11 millionSiyenza Toilet Tender Asset Restraint — R60MR60 million
View the full Corruption Asset Tracker →

Sourced exclusively from official public records (SIU, AFU, NPA, Hawks, Zondo Commission). This tracker does not make independent allegations; individuals listed have been formally implicated through legal proceedings or official investigations. Updated manually — may not reflect the latest case developments.