SARS 2026/2027LIVERepo Rate7.00%+0,25% since 28 May 2026Prime Rate10.50%+0,25% since 28 May 2026VAT Rate15%UIF CeilingR17,712Tax ThresholdR99,000USD/ZAR16.41Exchange rate updated 30 Sept 2026Municipal audits5 of 26clean · tracked hereLatest case27 Jul 2026GautengWater systems2824 cited-period concernsSARS 2026/2027LIVERepo Rate7.00%+0,25% since 28 May 2026Prime Rate10.50%+0,25% since 28 May 2026VAT Rate15%UIF CeilingR17,712Tax ThresholdR99,000USD/ZAR16.41Exchange rate updated 30 Sept 2026Municipal audits5 of 26clean · tracked hereLatest case27 Jul 2026GautengWater systems2824 cited-period concerns
OOdyssey Tools
Earn Airtime →
EvidenceNewer source available · Water quality assessmentsFamily-level scope · details ↓
Newer source availableWater quality assessments

A newer source cycle or material change has been observed. Odyssey has not fully migrated it, so this surface may retain older or mixed periods.

Period / scope
Blue Drop 2023 full entity records + 2025 Green Drop full national assessment + Blue/No Drop progress assessments released 31 March 2026; W4 records Green Drop row-level IRIS retrieval as source-unavailable without promoting legacy metro scores
Whole-dataset check
Checked 12 Aug 2026

Evidence status is dataset-family level. Row-level and field-level source labels still control where they are more specific.

Home›Water Quality Tracker›City of Tshwane
Gauteng · mixed cited assessment periods

City of Tshwane Water Quality

Blue Drop: 88/100

⚠ Concern recorded in cited drinking-water period

The directly cited Blue Drop 2023 record contains a drinking-water compliance or monitoring concern. It does not by itself establish a current do-not-drink advisory.

City of Tshwane in Gauteng has a directly cited DWS Blue Drop score of 88/100, with Odyssey tracker tier Adequate. In the 2023 record represented by this tracker, a drinking-water compliance or monitoring concern is stored. This is not a live do-not-drink advisory; confirm current status with the municipality or DWS. The wastewater risk label is mixed/supplementary tracker context and is not presented as a directly reconciled Green Drop result. A legacy 32.6% water-efficiency percentage is retained for audit continuity, but its exact measure basis is not treated as reconciled.

Metrics — cited source periods

Blue Drop (drinking water)88/100Direct DWS citation
Wastewater tracker riskPoorPrimary source pending
Drinking-water assessment signalConcern in cited periodCited-period concern
Wastewater assessment signalConcern / non-compliance in cited period
Legacy distribution-efficiency percentage32.6%Legacy percentage · measure basis pending
Population served4 040 315
Legacy row audit-year field2023

Blue Drop score lags well behind Joburg and Ekurhuleni. Repeat offender for microbiological compliance failures. DWS opened five Water Act cases against the metro. Wastewater treatment under significant stress with a Green Drop score of only 60. Periodic boil water advisories issued.

Programme provenance

Blue Drop: direct primary citation · 2023

Green Drop: programme-specific primary source pending

No Drop: programme-specific primary source pending

Current row citation — DWS Blue Drop 2023 + DWS Green Drop 2022

View current row citation →
📱 Share this water quality data

Other systems in Gauteng

City of Johannesburg✓ Cited-period passCity of Ekurhuleni✓ Cited-period passEmfuleni Local Municipality⚠ Cited-period concern
View the full Water Quality Tracker →

This tracked profile can combine Blue Drop, Green Drop, No Drop and supplementary sources from different periods. Programme labels above are only treated as directly sourced when the cited URL matches that DWS programme; otherwise primary-source reconciliation remains pending. Regulatory assessments describe the cited assessment period and are not live tap-water advisories. Follow current DWS or municipal advisories for immediate health guidance.