SARS 2026/2027LIVERepo Rate7.00%▲+0,25% since 28 May 2026Prime Rate10.50%▲+0,25% since 28 May 2026VAT Rate15%UIF CeilingR17,712Tax ThresholdR99,000USD/ZAR16.41Exchange rate updated 30 Sept 2026Municipal audits5 of 26clean · tracked hereLatest case27 Jul 2026GautengWater systems2824 cited-period concernsSARS 2026/2027LIVERepo Rate7.00%▲+0,25% since 28 May 2026Prime Rate10.50%▲+0,25% since 28 May 2026VAT Rate15%UIF CeilingR17,712Tax ThresholdR99,000USD/ZAR16.41Exchange rate updated 30 Sept 2026Municipal audits5 of 26clean · tracked hereLatest case27 Jul 2026GautengWater systems2824 cited-period concerns
EvidenceOfficial SAPS release · 1 reconciliation note · SAPS crime statisticsFamily-level scope · details ↓
Official SAPS release · 1 reconciliation noteSAPS crime statistics
Odyssey reproduces all 1,174 station identities in the official Q4 Detailed Stats workbook and reconciles tested provincial and national totals. SAPS separately states that the release draws on 1,175 police stations, so one source-count discrepancy remains documented rather than inferred away.
- Period / scope
- Q4 2025/26 — January to March 2026
- Whole-dataset check
- Checked 26 Aug 2026
Evidence status is dataset-family level. Row-level and field-level source labels still control where they are more specific.
My South Africa
Save this station on this device for quick return visits.
Station profile · Gauteng · Q4 2025/26
Mamelodi East Police Station
Tshwane District · Gauteng · Official SAPS workbook row
2 matched Q4 periodsIncluded in highlighted map subset
In Q4 2025/26 (Jan–Mar 2026), Mamelodi East recorded 17 reported murders, 33 reported rapes, 40 reported carjackings and 673 reported contact crimes. These are police-station counts, not population-adjusted risk measures.
Murder ranking is shown nationally by reported murder count and within Gauteng; equal counts share the same competition rank.
Murder
17
16 → 17 · +1 (+6.3%)
National #62 · Gauteng #19
Rape
33
34 → 33 · -1 (-2.9%)
National #34 · Gauteng #6
Carjacking
40
65 → 40 · -25 (-38.5%)
National #11 · Gauteng #8
All Contact Crime
673
743 → 673 · -70 (-9.4%)
National #20 · Gauteng #7
Largest count increase
Common Assault
+4 incidents · +1.5%
Largest count decrease
All Contact Crime
-70 incidents · -9.4%
Full station profile
Reported counts, movement and ranking context
Q4 2024/25 → Q4 2025/26
Murder
National #62 of 1 174 · Gauteng #19 of 146
Rape
National #34 of 1 174 · Gauteng #6 of 146
Carjacking
National #11 of 1 174 · Gauteng #8 of 146
House Robbery
National #18 of 1 174 · Gauteng #8 of 146
Assault GBH
National #18 of 1 174 · Gauteng #6 of 146
167
171 → 167 · -4 · -2.3%
Common Assault
National #10 of 1 174 · Gauteng #1 of 146
272
268 → 272 · +4 · +1.5%
Sexual Offences
National #32 of 1 174 · Gauteng #5 of 146
Business Robbery
National #90 of 1 174 · Gauteng #42 of 146
Vehicle Theft
National #181 of 1 174 · Gauteng #93 of 146
All Contact Crime
National #20 of 1 174 · Gauteng #7 of 146
673
743 → 673 · -70 · -9.4%
Ranks use current reported station counts. Equal counts share the same competition rank. Categories overlap conceptually, so Odyssey does not sum the displayed rows into a synthetic total or score.
Interpretation guardrail
This profile shows reported incident counts for one SAPS station row. Odyssey does not convert those counts into a safety or danger classification, and does not derive a station-level per-capita crime rate because a defensible population denominator for each police-station geography is not part of this dataset.
Comparable station profiles
Same district first, then same province
Source integrity & methodology ↓
Crime values come from the official SAPS Q4 2025/26 Detailed Stats workbook (Jan–Mar 2026) and its matched Q4 2024/25 (Jan–Mar 2025) station counts. Odyssey reconciles 1 174 workbook station rows.
SAPS states that the release covers 1 175 police stations while the detailed workbook exposes 1 174 station-level statistical identities. The one-station difference remains unresolved; Odyssey does not invent a missing row. The SAPS contact directory is identity context only, not crime-value evidence.