Gauteng · PUBLIC-RECORD DOSSIER
Nangamso Tyibilika SANDF Pension Preservation — R1.5M
R1.5 millionCivil proceedingsPreserved / restrainedOfficial primary citation
Nangamso Tyibilika SANDF Pension Preservation — R1.5M is tracked with a matter-specific row value of R1.5 million in Gauteng. The matter is recorded at the stage of civil proceedings with an asset status of preserved / restrained. Odyssey does not infer that the row value equals the amount frozen, forfeited, recovered or lost unless the cited record says so. The cited matter relates to the Department of Defence — South African National Defence Force. The cited source names or links Nangamso Tyibilika to the matter; inclusion here does not independently establish guilt or a final adverse finding.
Record semantics
Tracked row valueR1.5 million
Amount meaningRestrained funds
Amount precisionApproximate amount
Value basisSIU-stated approximate value of GEPF pension benefit preserved by the Special Tribunal pending civil recovery; distinguished from R28 million state loss and R272.8 million PPE contracts.
Case stageCivil proceedings
Asset statusPreserved / restrained
Recorded legacy statusAssets Frozen
Recorded date30 April 2025
Matter & assets
The SIU obtained a preservation order interdicting payment of about R1.5 million in pension benefits due to former SANDF official Nangamso Tyibilika. Tyibilika played a central role in irregular COVID PPE awards, with losses exceeding R28 million across ten contracts awarded to five suppliers.
Asset / subject descriptionPension benefit of approximately R1.5 million
Department / entityDepartment of Defence — South African National Defence Force
Court orderSpecial Tribunal preservation order, 31 March 2025
MappingNot currently mapped
Location descriptionPretoria — SANDF COVID PPE procurement, Gauteng
Named / linked in cited source (1)
Naming/linkage in the cited record does not independently establish guilt or a final adverse finding.
Nangamso Tyibilika
Evidence & provenance
Citation publisher
Special Investigating Unit
Citation type: Official primary citation
Verification: Official primary citation
Source checked: 2026-09-20
View cited source →Scope & interpretation
Entries summarise cited public records, which can include preservation or forfeiture orders, charges, investigations, judgments and settlements. Statuses are source-bounded; inclusion does not by itself establish criminal guilt or a final finding against a named person or entity.
Tracked row value reflects the value referenced in the cited record. The headline is the arithmetic sum of each tracked row’s matter-specific value. Rows can refer to preserved or forfeited assets, alleged scheme or contract values, repayments, restrained funds or other source-defined amounts. It is not a national corruption total, a recovered-assets total, or a de-duplicated measure of public loss.
Some legacy rows still cite documented secondary sources or generic agency pages rather than a direct case-level primary source. Updated manually — may not reflect the latest case developments.
Share this dossierExplore other tracked records
View the full Corruption Asset Tracker →Entries summarise cited public records, which can include preservation or forfeiture orders, charges, investigations, judgments and settlements. Statuses are source-bounded; inclusion does not by itself establish criminal guilt or a final finding against a named person or entity. Some legacy rows still cite documented secondary sources or generic agency pages rather than a direct case-level primary source. The headline is the arithmetic sum of each tracked row’s matter-specific value. Rows can refer to preserved or forfeited assets, alleged scheme or contract values, repayments, restrained funds or other source-defined amounts. It is not a national corruption total, a recovered-assets total, or a de-duplicated measure of public loss. Updated manually — may not reflect the latest case developments.