Gauteng · PUBLIC-RECORD DOSSIER
Marubini Ramatsekisa NLC Pension Interdict
R1.7 millionCivil proceedingsPreserved / restrainedOfficial primary citation
Marubini Ramatsekisa NLC Pension Interdict is tracked with a matter-specific row value of R1.7 million in Gauteng. The matter is recorded at the stage of civil proceedings with an asset status of preserved / restrained. Odyssey does not infer that the row value equals the amount frozen, forfeited, recovered or lost unless the cited record says so. The cited matter relates to the National Lotteries Commission. The cited source names or links 3 people or entities to the matter, including Marubini Ramatsekisa, Alfred Nevhutanda, Tshilidzi Rachel Nevhutanda; inclusion here does not independently establish guilt or a final adverse finding.
Record semantics
Tracked row valueR1.7 million
Amount meaningRestrained funds
Amount precisionApproximate amount
Value basisSIU-stated approximate value of pension benefits interdicted by the Special Tribunal pending civil recovery proceedings; distinguished from approximately R4 million in NLC losses.
Case stageCivil proceedings
Asset statusPreserved / restrained
Recorded legacy statusAssets Frozen
Recorded date4 February 2025
Matter & assets
The Special Tribunal dismissed former NLC chief risk officer Marubini Ramatsekisa's attempt to overturn an interdict on his pension. The SIU says Ramatsekisa facilitated a proactive-funding scheme costing the NLC about R4 million; his interdicted pension benefits of about R1.7 million remain frozen.
Asset / subject descriptionPension benefits of approximately R1.7 million
Department / entityNational Lotteries Commission
Court orderSpecial Tribunal order 23 January 2025; original interdict December 2023
MappingNot currently mapped
Location descriptionPretoria — NLC proactive funding fraud, Gauteng
Named / linked in cited source (3)
Naming/linkage in the cited record does not independently establish guilt or a final adverse finding.
Marubini RamatsekisaAlfred NevhutandaTshilidzi Rachel Nevhutanda
Evidence & provenance
Citation publisher
Special Investigating Unit
Citation type: Official primary citation
Verification: Official primary citation
Source checked: 2026-09-21
View cited source →Scope & interpretation
Entries summarise cited public records, which can include preservation or forfeiture orders, charges, investigations, judgments and settlements. Statuses are source-bounded; inclusion does not by itself establish criminal guilt or a final finding against a named person or entity.
Tracked row value reflects the value referenced in the cited record. The headline is the arithmetic sum of each tracked row’s matter-specific value. Rows can refer to preserved or forfeited assets, alleged scheme or contract values, repayments, restrained funds or other source-defined amounts. It is not a national corruption total, a recovered-assets total, or a de-duplicated measure of public loss.
Some legacy rows still cite documented secondary sources or generic agency pages rather than a direct case-level primary source. Updated manually — may not reflect the latest case developments.
Share this dossierExplore other tracked records
View the full Corruption Asset Tracker →Entries summarise cited public records, which can include preservation or forfeiture orders, charges, investigations, judgments and settlements. Statuses are source-bounded; inclusion does not by itself establish criminal guilt or a final finding against a named person or entity. Some legacy rows still cite documented secondary sources or generic agency pages rather than a direct case-level primary source. The headline is the arithmetic sum of each tracked row’s matter-specific value. Rows can refer to preserved or forfeited assets, alleged scheme or contract values, repayments, restrained funds or other source-defined amounts. It is not a national corruption total, a recovered-assets total, or a de-duplicated measure of public loss. Updated manually — may not reflect the latest case developments.