Gauteng · PUBLIC-RECORD DOSSIER
Digital Vibes COVID/NHI Contract Corruption
R150 millionSemantic classification pendingPrimary-source reconciliation pending
Digital Vibes COVID/NHI Contract Corruption is tracked with a matter-specific row value of R150 million in Gauteng. Case-stage and asset-status semantics remain pending legacy reconciliation. Odyssey does not infer that the row value equals the amount frozen, forfeited, recovered or lost unless the cited record says so. The cited matter relates to the National Department of Health. The cited source names or links 4 people or entities to the matter, including Dedani Mkhize, Sithokozile Khalipele Mkhize, May Mkhize and 1 others; inclusion here does not independently establish guilt or a final adverse finding.
Record semantics
Tracked row valueR150 million
Amount meaningPending legacy classification
Amount precisionPending legacy classification
Case stagePending legacy classification
Asset statusPending legacy classification
Recorded legacy statusUnder Investigation
Recorded date13 April 2022
Matter & assets
The SIU sought to set aside R150 million in Department of Health media contracts awarded irregularly to Digital Vibes for COVID-19 and NHI campaigns. Approximately R5 million was funneled to companies owned by former Health Minister Zweli Mkhize's son and wife. The Special Tribunal allowed adding Mkhize family companies to the recovery application.
Asset / subject descriptionR150 million in irregular DoH contract payments; R5 million received by Mkhize family companies
Department / entityNational Department of Health
Court orderSpecial Tribunal order, 13 April 2022
MappingNot currently mapped
Location descriptionPretoria, National Department of Health, Gauteng
Named / linked in cited source (4)
Naming/linkage in the cited record does not independently establish guilt or a final adverse finding.
Dedani MkhizeSithokozile Khalipele MkhizeMay MkhizeZweli Mkhize
Evidence & provenance
Citation publisher
South African Government
Citation type: Legacy citation (unclassified)
Verification: Primary-source reconciliation pending
View cited source →Scope & interpretation
Entries summarise cited public records, which can include preservation or forfeiture orders, charges, investigations, judgments and settlements. Statuses are source-bounded; inclusion does not by itself establish criminal guilt or a final finding against a named person or entity.
Tracked row value reflects the value referenced in the cited record. The headline is the arithmetic sum of each tracked row’s matter-specific value. Rows can refer to preserved or forfeited assets, alleged scheme or contract values, repayments, restrained funds or other source-defined amounts. It is not a national corruption total, a recovered-assets total, or a de-duplicated measure of public loss.
Some legacy rows still cite documented secondary sources or generic agency pages rather than a direct case-level primary source. Updated manually — may not reflect the latest case developments.
Share this dossierExplore other tracked records
View the full Corruption Asset Tracker →Entries summarise cited public records, which can include preservation or forfeiture orders, charges, investigations, judgments and settlements. Statuses are source-bounded; inclusion does not by itself establish criminal guilt or a final finding against a named person or entity. Some legacy rows still cite documented secondary sources or generic agency pages rather than a direct case-level primary source. The headline is the arithmetic sum of each tracked row’s matter-specific value. Rows can refer to preserved or forfeited assets, alleged scheme or contract values, repayments, restrained funds or other source-defined amounts. It is not a national corruption total, a recovered-assets total, or a de-duplicated measure of public loss. Updated manually — may not reflect the latest case developments.